Colonisation of Australia led to big increase in wildfire danger
An analysis of lake sediments in south-eastern Australia has revealed that the expulsion of Indigenous communities in the 19th century resulted in an explosion of tree cover and more devastating wildfires
The colonisation of Australia transformed much of its landscape into forests with a high density of gum trees, and this led to the country’s cycles of dangerous wildfires, an analysis of 1000 years’ worth of lake sediment reveals.
“The catastrophic fires that we’re dealing with now are the product of colonisation and the product of land-use change, not solely the product of climate change,” says Michael-Shawn Fletcher at the University of Melbourne, in Australia.
The combination of increased temperatures and drought with an explosion in the density of eucalypt forests dramatically enhanced the risk of bushfires and drove the 2019-20 “black summer” fires, which burned 24 million hectares, says Fletcher.
Advertisement
He and his colleagues extracted a metre-long core, representing a millennium of sediment deposition, from the bed of Purghagoolah, also known as Lake Elusive, in Croajingolong National Park in south-eastern Australia.
The lake is surrounded by forest and has a catchment area of around 10,000 square kilometres. It is an area where people are largely excluded and nature is unimpeded by active management.
The researchers examined the core at 0.5-centimetre intervals and found that the sediment deposition suddenly changed 200 years ago.
Prior to the arrival of the British, the local Indigenous community, the GunaiKurnai, had managed the landscape, primarily through cultural burning practices, for thousands of years. Pollen falling into the lake was reflective of open woodland vegetation, with a tree cover of around 10 per cent for 800 years, right up until the local colonisation.
But between 1830 and 1860, European settlers massacred and forcibly removed the Indigenous population and cultural burning ceased.
Early settlers to the region reported being able to easily move herds of cattle through the area, which was then much more open woodland.
Shrub species swiftly moved in and, as charcoal evidence demonstrated, bushfires became hotter, which in turn led to thicker regeneration of eucalypt species and tree cover increased to around 40 per cent.
“Critically, at the same time, we could see the first evidence of soil erosion in the entire thousand years,” says Fletcher. “Fire temperature went up, fire amount went up, eucalypt cover went up, and it trapped this system into a hot, catastrophic fire loop.”
Analysis of other sites throughout south-eastern Australia is revealing a similar story, he says, with up to six times as many eucalypts in the modern period as there were in the past.
When tree density increases, the canopy begins to connect, creating conditions where flames can spread more easily, while shrub growth on the forest floor means fire can “ladder” up to the crown of the forest.
Although climate change will continue to drive wildfires, a return to a regime of widespread cultural burning would help to reduce their intensity and impact, says Fletcher.
He argues that the “cult of the tree” is having devastating consequences in terms of economic loss and national trauma. Also, these much denser forests don’t hold carbon securely because they are so much more prone to igniting.
“It’s a myth that south-east Australian eucalypt forests can store carbon safely for a long period of time managed as they are today,” he says. “It’s pointless actually trying to do so because it’ll go up in smoke – 2019/2020 proved this.”
David Bowman at the University of Tasmania, Australia, says the study reinforces other research suggesting drastic vegetation changes following the collapse of Indigenous fire management.
“It will energise debates around sustainable fire management, the pivotal role for including Aboriginal fire groups in that journey as well as asking deep questions around the restoration of overgrown, thickened bushland,” says Bowman. “Australians have a lot of research and development to do to get into a safe space with climate change-enhanced wildfires.”
“It’s probably the clearest example yet that pre-invasion landscapes were substantially altered by the removal of Indigenous fire management, and we are now paying the price for it,” says Michael Bird at James Cook University in Townsville, Australia.
Nature: DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-11097-z
What's Your Reaction?
